![]() Almost the exact opposite of 24-Hour Armor, Battle Ballgown. ![]() There is a Web Comic by the same name, which naturally features one. See Thong of Shielding, Stripperiffic, Fan Service, Bare Your Midriff, Cleavage Window. Though assigning blame to munchkins works just as well.įorm-Fitting Wardrobe is the Super-Trope for this. If played for laughs, it's usually "justified" by a distraction bonus. Armored spike-heel gogo boots on otherwise bare legs.Relatively realistic armor, with a sizable flash of cleavage.While the dresses they wear into battle sometimes seem more appropriate to Frederick's of Hollywood than the Forest of Sherwood, their protection is not the physical sort. All she has from the bottom of her ribcage to her knees is a pair of lambskin panties.įemale magic wielders are given a pass. Oftentimes the armor seems perfectly workable except for one area, as in a female warrior decked out with heavy boots, a chest plate, shoulder pads and gauntlets. A big patch of cleavage over your heart is like a beacon for every archer in the kingdom. I just hope they have a little left in their budget to improve the characters a bit.Armor worn by female characters in fantasy (and sometimes other Speculative Fiction or even historical) settings is implausibly designed to bare and/or flatter their secondary sexual characteristics, often voiding its protective qualities. I understand TA doesn’t have a ton of resources so I give them a lot of leeway because the core system is so good. I’d just like the art direction to be consistent. Some of the faces look like photoshop of actual faces and I get that uncanny valley vibe sometimes (it may also have to do with the faces not blinking). I think my problem with the faces is, they tried to make them realistic but decided to keep the hair like “mini figs” as you put it. Doesn't necessarily mean "better" though. if you compare them to BG3, then yes, BG3 has the "more realistic" graphics. But if you approach the characters from the point of view of "these are mini-figures that they've brought to life", then artistically, it fits and works (I think).īut yeah. Whether I'm right or wrong, we'll probably never find out. In that context, the hair and general look makes total sense. I haven't seen anyone comment one way or the other, but given the look (especially the hair), my guess is that they took their art inspiration from mini-figures and the direction was "let's start with mini-figs and bring them to life". So it's unlikely that the characters are "bad" (e.g. So after initially thinking "man these toons are kind of ugly", I took the approach of thinking "apart from the characters, all of the other art in this game is amazing - concepts used for backgrounds, weapons, armors, maps". If a game decides to use a cartoonish art direction, people are far more forgiving as to the quality of the graphics. The article points out that this isn't the same as "art direction". "Graphics" is largely taken to mean "how realistic is it". art direction".īasically, the point of the article is that judging things by how realistic and life-like they are is a trap that gamers have gotten into. However, I've since changed my point of view after reading something about "graphics vs. Yeah, my first thought about the characters is that they were ugly. The female leather armor is the only one that I find a bit disappointing. :) I've actually been really impressed by all of the "props" (weapons, armor, potions, gems, books, etc.). :)Īlso, I wanted to say "great job" to the artist who did the female breastplate armor look. I just kind of like Ranger more anyway and I'm looking for any excuse to use Ranger over Rogue. So, strictly for aesthetic purposes, Lowlife Sylvan Elf Ranger just beat out any female Rogue simply because the Ranger can wear the breastplate.Īnd yes, I know the Rogue could wear it too if you take Sellsword background, but. I think the breastplate armor says "look all you want, but if you touch you're going to lose that hand". ![]() She's not some over-sexualized goddess in a chainmail bikini - she's covered basically head to toe, so the armor looks like it'll actually protect her (shocking, eh?) - but she still looks really good. However, today I stumbled across the first Breastplate armor that I've seen and I put it on my female, elven fighter (DEX-based) and wow. It bugs me that the male leather is black, cool and screams "I'm a bad ass" while the female leather is brown and just says "budget city guard". I usually choose this character to be female and they wind up in leather armor. ![]() (Other three are Spellblade Fighter, Cleric (still seeing which domain I like best), and Shock Arcanist Wizard. This is silly, but I've been going back and forth over Rogue, or Lowlife Ranger for my 4th character slot. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |